Ready when the next guest is.
Free for the first 25 agreements a month. No card to start.
Photo and media releases
The picture is already taken. Somebody in marketing wants to use it, somebody in the office thinks there was a form, and nobody can find out in less than an hour whether the answer was yes.
A permission to photograph or film somebody and to use the result, with the scope written down and the answer recorded against the person rather than assumed from silence.
Also called: media release · image release · likeness release · publicity release · model release
Not a feature list. These are the three moments this exists for.
A tick on a page in a folder in an office. The person about to post the photograph is in a different building, on a Saturday, with a phone, and they are going to guess.
A sign at the door saying photographs may be taken is not a release, and treating it as one is exactly the thing that becomes a problem the first time somebody minds.
Somebody changes their mind. There is no process, so it becomes an email to whoever they can find, and whether anything happens depends on that person's afternoon.
Not a line buried in a waiver that nobody reads, and not a condition of the service. Somebody can say no to the photograph and yes to the activity, which is the only honest way to ask.
Where it may be used, for how long, and whether the person is named. A release that says 'any purpose, forever' is the one people refuse, and the one that is hardest to defend.
The answer comes back through the API as a field, so a roster, a check-in screen or a tablet can show it at the moment it matters.
What a release must say to be effective, whether a minor's can be given by a guardian at all, and what happens to material already published when somebody withdraws, are all set where you operate. The starter marks those for an attorney. What we provide is the asking, the record and the withdrawal — not an opinion about the law of your state.
The same document, sent by businesses that have nothing else in common.
Yes, and the record shows when. New use stops; what has already been published is a question for your counsel and the platform it is on, and the document says so rather than promising something nobody can deliver.
It does not have to be, and it should be. Bundling them means a person who wants the activity and not the photograph has to refuse both, which makes the consent worth less rather than more.
The guardian answers, per child, and the answer is recorded against that child. Whether a guardian may give it at all for the use you have in mind is a question the starter marks for an attorney.
Free for the first 25 agreements a month. No card to start.